Cristina Diaz Adrover vs Maria Garcia Cid Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 Nov at 10:31 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Diaz Adrover vs M. Garcia Cid

ESP
0
Win
Played
1
Win

ESP
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Adrover 0 - 1 Cid
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cristina Diaz Adrover winning 0 and Maria Garcia Cid winning 2. The last match between Maria Garcia Cid and Cristina Diaz Adrover was at the W15 Castellon, 08-11-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Maria Garcia Cid getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Adrover | 0 |
| Cid | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(SF) W15 Castellon(11-08-25)
C. D. Adrover vs M. G. Cid H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 63.54% (122-70) | Career Total W/L | 55.07% (38-31) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. D. Adrover vs M. G. Cid Match Preview:
- In terms of second serve points won, Maria Garcia Cid has a slight edge over Cristina Diaz Adrover, winning 36.25% compared to 35.10% in recent form. Does this indicate who might have an advantage? Potentially, as this is a key indicator for match prediction.
- Looking at return game efficiency, Cristina Diaz Adrover excels with 55.04% of her opponent's second serves won, which is superior to Garcia Cid's 49.76%. Can this impact the match outcome? Yes, as strong returns can break an opponent's rhythm.
- Both players show similar capabilities when returning first serves, with Diaz Adrover at 37.46% and Garcia Cid slightly behind at 36.23%, indicating a relatively balanced skill in this aspect.
- Under pressure, Maria Garcia Cid slightly surpasses Diaz Adrover by saving 43.10% of breakpoints compared to 41.90%. Could this affect tight match situations? Indeed, breakpoint resilience often decides critical points.
- In terms of overall match win rate over the last year, Garcia Cid boasts a higher 78.95% compared to Diaz Adrover's 65.12%, suggesting a significant performance gap.
- Both players perform best on clay with a 65% win rate. However, Garcia Cid has a weaker overall performance on hard surfaces (40%) compared to Diaz Adrover's 50% on indoor hard courts.
- When considering event level, Garcia Cid has performed excellently with an 81.82% win rate at Futures events, while Diaz Adrover has a moderate 55.36% win rate at Challenger levels. Does this hint at who is better suited for the upcoming match? It may, given the context of the event.
- The average rank of their past opponents suggests Diaz Adrover has faced tougher competition (151.59 vs. Garcia Cid's 297.32), potentially preparing her better for higher-level opponents.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Garcia Cid has been more successful, winning 80% of such scenarios, while Diaz Adrover has 65% success in deciding sets.
Editorial Prediction (November 8, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Cristina Diaz Adrover and Maria Garcia Cid promises to be an intriguing battle of skills and resilience. While both players have strengths in different areas, certain factors may tip the balance in one direction.
Cristina Diaz Adrover showcases a stronger return game, a crucial aspect that could disrupt Garcia Cid's serve and grant opportunities to break. However, Maria Garcia Cid's capability to save breakpoints and her overall higher win percentage over the past year highlight her consistency and competitiveness.
The varying levels of competition each has faced could mean that Diaz Adrover is better adapted to handling pressure from higher-ranked opponents, though Garcia Cid's success in decisive sets speaks to her tenacity.
Taking into account all these factors, Maria Garcia Cid appears to have a slight edge due to her superior match win rate, breakpoint resilience, and success in deciding sets, making her the more probable winner in their upcoming encounter.
Cristina Diaz Adrover vs Maria Garcia Cid Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. D. Adrover vs M. G. Cid H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 8 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:59:33 | Average Match Time | 1:59:33 |
| 77% (53/69) | 1st Serve % | 73% (44/60) |
| 45% (24/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (28/44) |
| 50% (8/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (6/16) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 54% (7/13) |
| 43% (26/60) | Return Points Win % | 54% (37/69) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. D. Adrover Recent Matches Played
M. G. Cid Recent Matches Played

C. D. Adrover vs M. G. Cid Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.54% (122/70) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.07% (38/31) |
| 60.27% (264/174) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.64% (81/70) |
| 54.16% (2129/1802) | Games Win/Loss | 52.02% (709/654) |
| 58.06% (18/13) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (10/15) |
| 64.97% (102/55) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.12% (28/15) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 100 | Aces Total | 21 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 291 | Total Double Faults | 136 |
| 1:26:33 | Average Match Time | 1:10:3 |
| 388.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 407.19 |
| 66% (6207/9438) | 1st Serve % | 70% (2081/2993) |
| 57% (3564/6207) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (1142/2081) |
| 45% (1438/3231) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (393/912) |
| 50% (734/1460) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (202/385) |
| 50% (4927/9767) | Return Points Win % | 47% (1410/2979) |
| 53.75% (43/37) | Challenger W/L | 47.22% (17/19) |
| 70.54% (79/33) | Futures W/L | 63.64% (21/12) |
| 63% (118/188) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (38/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (11/23) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (5/9) |
| 59% (33/56) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (9/14) |
| 89% (120/107) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 97% (33/32) |
| 11% (120/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 3% (33/1) |
| 21% (72/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (36/6) |